Cis 498 project deliverable 3: database and programming design

Points: 150

Project Deliverable 3: Database and Programming Design

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

Section 1: Design Document

1a. Create a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletelycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Insufficiently created a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Partiallycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Satisfactorilycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

Thoroughlycreated a database schema that supports the company’s business and processes.

1b. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Insufficiently explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Partiallyexplained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Satisfactorily explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

Thoroughly explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.

1c. Create database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions then identify primary keys and foreign keys, and explain how referential integrity will be achieved.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Did not submit or incompletely identified primary keys and foreign keys. Did not submit or incompletely explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Insufficiently created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Insufficiently identified primary keys and foreign keys. Insufficiently explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Partially created database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Partially identified primary keys and foreign keys, explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Satisfactorilycreated database tables with appropriate field- naming conventions. Satisfactorily identified primary keys and foreign keys. Satisfactorilyexplained how referential integrity will be achieved.

Thoroughlycreated database tables with appropriate field-naming conventions. Thoroughly identified primary keys and foreign keys. Thoroughly explained how referential integrity will be achieved.

1d. Normalize the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Insufficiently normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Partially normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Satisfactorily normalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

Thoroughlynormalized the database tables to third normal form (3NF).

1e. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Insufficiently created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

1f. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.

1g. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Insufficiently created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Partially created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Satisfactorily created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

Thoroughly created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.

1h. Explain your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your DFD.

1i. Create at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Insufficiently created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Partially created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Satisfactorily created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

Thoroughly created at least two (2) sample queries that will support the organizational reporting needs.

1j. Create at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Weight: 5%

 

Did not submit or incompletely created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Insufficiently created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Partiallycreated at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Satisfactorily created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Thoroughly created at least two (2) screen layouts that illustrate the interface that organizational users will utilize.

Section 2: Revised Gantt Chart / Project Plan

2. Update the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Insufficiently updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Partially updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Satisfactorily updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

Thoroughly updated the Gantt chart or project plan (summary and detail) template, from Project Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with all the project tasks.

3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency