USE Reference Provided in ParagraphÂ
Proactive vs. Reactive Changes
â€œOrganizational change can occur by choice (proactive) or by force (reactive).â€ Proactive change happens when changes are implemented â€œto avoid possible issues or to capitalize on a future opportunity.â€ Reactive change occurs â€œin response to an issue or opportunity that has occurredâ€ (Weiss, 2016).
Example of proactive change: A company that utilizes a self-evaluation program â€œto analyze its productivity, efficiency, worker morale and other areas that bear improvingâ€ (Mack, n.d.). This is a perfect example of an organization proactively implementing change in the workplace to avoid potential issues later down the line. Being proactive typically puts a company ahead of the competition.
Example of reactive change: A company that does nothing to improve productivity and cost until they are faced with an economic crisis (Mack, n.d.). When companies ignore potential problems or fail at anticipating potential issues they put themselves at risk, and allow proactive organizations (competitors) to surpass them.
How could this information be useful to an organization?
Leaders of organizations should know, that according to studies, a reactive leadership style is â€œneither positive nor beneficial in the short or long termâ€ for the company or stakeholders (Weiss, 2016). Proactive leadership is not only more effective but preferred because it fosters solutions before there are even problems. Reactive leaders are frantic, unprepared, and often lack perspective. On the other hand, proactive leaders are mindful, organized, and prepared for potential threats (Weiss, 2016). A proactive leadership style can increase a companyâ€™s reputation, social standing, and financial worth, while also putting them far ahead of their competition.
Mack, S. (n.d.). Being Proactive Vs. Reactive. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/being-proactive-vs-reactive-57503.html
Weiss, J. (2016). Organizational Change Second Edition [Electronic Version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/books/AUMGT435.16.1/sections/navpoint-1
The Stakeholder Approach is an effective approach to organizational change.Â What this approach does in take into consideration how the changes to an organization will affect stakeholders before, during and after the implementation as well as the values and ethics of the organization.Â (Weiss, 2016).Â A stakeholder, as defined by Freeman, â€œis any group or individual that can affect or is affected by the achievement of organizationâ€™ objectivesâ€.Â This includes those that work for or with the company as well as those in the companyâ€™s community and any organization that the company assist.Â Stakeholder Approach causes the organization to stop focusing on the profits to be earned right now but to instead focus on the long-term success of the organization.Â (Scott, 2017).
This approach would be beneficial to an organization that is looking to making transitional or transformational changes.Â When making large scale changes it not only affects the employees but it also affects vendors, creditors, shareholders and even the community.Â Some large scale changes mean moving to a new location which could adversely affect the area the company is leaving or the one it is moving into.Â Will the move cause people to lose their jobs or have to commute longer distances?Â What will the shipping costs be and how will that affect the price of the products?Â Is the company expanding into the global market?Â Who will be the overseas supplies?Â These are just a couple of questions that could come up.Â Using the Stakeholder Approach will help answer these types of questions as well as provide feedback on the feasibility of the expected change.Â Gathering data from all possible avenues before implementing a change will provide a higher rate of success, Stakeholder Approach seems to be the best way to gather that information.
Weiss, J.W. (2016). Organizational Change (2nd ed.) [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/Links to an external site.
Scott, Grygor.Â 2017.Â The Concepts, Evidence & Implications of the Stakeholder Theory of a Corporation.Â Retrieved from:Â http://smallbusiness.chron.com/concepts-evidence-implications-stakeholder-theory-corporation-33236.htmlLinks to an external site.
We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.Read more
The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.Read more
The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.Read more
By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.Read more